The following industry articles have been placed on Real Estate IRA Online and written by industry experts:

UBTI -- When Does It Apply to Real Estate Transactions?

With the popularity of investing with self-directed IRAs at an all-time high, there is a strong possibility that you or someone you know will be using retirement funds to purchase real estate, invest in loans, buy a business, or invest in other “nontraditional” investments. Self-directed IRA holders have a vastly increased number of investment options available to them than those with IRA funds invested at a traditional brokerage house.

One important factor that impacts the investment choices of self-directed IRA investors, however, is Unrelated Business Taxable Income or UBIT. Often overlooked or misunderstood, UBIT is a special tax that Congress created to apply to tax-exempt entities that produce income from business activity rather than from “passive” investments. In addition to churches, charities and non-profits, IRAs can also be subject to UBIT.

The majority of self-directed IRA investments are considered passive investments, including; interest from loans, dividends from securities, real estate rental incomes and the proceeds of the sale of real estate that was held for appreciation. These types of investments are exempt from UBIT.

The types of income that could subject an IRA to UBIT are those earned from the sale of a product or service, whether retail or wholesale and regardless of ownership percentage. Where self-directed IRA investors are most likely to encounter UBIT is in certain types of real estate projects. 

A self-directed IRA investor would most commonly face UBIT on the profits generated from rehab/flips or development /construction projects that result from a resale. In contrast, incomes from properties purchased for appreciation and/or rental incomes are exempt from taxation in an IRA, unless the property is purchased on leverage (which is an entirely different topic and won’t be covered in this article). The area where investors, and often their tax advisors, get confused is in determining which projects produce passive tax-exempt income and which produce business income where UBIT would apply.

The IRS and the tax courts use a series of tests to determine if an activity is a passive investment or a business activity. There are up to 10 factors that can be considered. No factor is more important than the other, and no one factor is determinative. Here are some of the most common tests used:  

  • Intent – Did the individual buy the property with the intent to hold it for appreciation? Or did the individual buy the property to resell it quickly? If the intent was to hold it for appreciation, this is a strong indication that it is an investment and not taxable to the IRA. If the intent was for resale, then there is a strong likelihood that the activity will be deemed a business and taxable to the IRA.

    • Development or Construction – In general, development and construction are considered activities that are designed to increase the value of the asset through action as opposed to appreciation. Development or construction activities imply that the investment project is business-related and therefore taxable in the IRA.

 

    • Holding Period – The longer the property is held from either the original purchase or from the completion of development or construction, the less likely the income will be subject to UBTI when it is eventually sold. In most cases, one year from the completion of development/construction is considered the minimum length of time the property should be held to offset the business factors of development/construction activities– but that must be discussed with a qualified tax professional.

 

    • Marketing – Marketing activities include any activities that are designed to attract a potential buyer. The longer you advertise and the more aggressive the marketing, the more likely your investment will be considered a business and will be subject to UBTI.

 

    • Inventory Replacement – If your IRA sells an asset and then replaces that asset with another similar asset to be sold, this is holding the property only as inventory. The more rapid or frequent the replacement and resale cycle, the more likely it is that UBTI taxes will apply.

If you are considering, or already have a self-directed IRA, it is encouraged to consult your qualified tax professional to gain a better understanding of the potential tax implications. Even for the vast majority of investments that incur UBIT, the benefits of the self-directed IRA investment will outweigh tax implications.  Your tax advisor may be able to identify other factors to consider with your specific IRA situation, and realizing these factors should enable you to realize even greater financing benefits.

IRAs Move From the Stock Market to Real Estate and Beyond

For years, the public had been content to have their IRA monies invested in traditional stocks, bonds and mutual funds. In fact, they thought little, if at all, about the money sitting in their retirement account. All that changed when the stock market crashed in 2000, and the value of individual retirement accounts suddenly nosedived.

That reality check, combined with the Baby Boomer generation hitting retirement age, has spurred a renewed interest in IRAs, 401(k)s, and similar pension/retirement accounts. What many people didn’t realize – and are coming to learn – is that their IRA funds can be “self-directed” outside the stock market and into nearly any area they choose, including real estate, tax liens, personal loans, foreign properties, and private businesses This realization has created a rapidly growing “self-directed IRA” industry.

Diversification of investments through self-directed IRAs can produce some excellent returns. However, there are IRS and Department of Labor guidelines that should be observed when self-directing IRA money – specifically, avoiding “prohibited transactions.” These include investing in life insurance contracts and collectibles, or entering into transactions with “disqualified parties” (like close relatives). These guidelines were established to ensure that the IRA holder (the account’s trustee/fiduciary) protects his/her IRA assets by steering clear of transactions that could create a conflict of interest.

For example, if one’s retirement account purchased a rental home as an investment, that home could not be rented out to the account holder’s grandmother. The reasoning is that if the grandmother fails to pay her rent, the account holder would find it difficult to evict her and replace her with a paying tenant – the latter being in the best financial interest of the retirement account.

Those pursuing self-directed IRAs are turning increasingly to financial services companies like Guidant that structure accounts and provide ongoing customer service and continuing education as well. Since this is a new area of investing for many, easy access to information and support can help keep investors away from questionable transactions.

Guidant has found that the majority of its clients are interested in diversifying their funds into real estate and rental properties, despite the housing market’s erratic behavior. One of Guidant’s AurigaTM clients lost $150,000 in his 401(k) by investing in the stock market before switching to a self-directed IRA. By using his self-directed IRA to purchase a rental home, he is generating $700/month positive cash flow back into his retirement fund tax-deferred. And when the time is right, he has the option of selling the home for a good profit – which will also go back into his IRA tax-deferred.

Says the client, “I will be looking for another home to add to my IRA in the coming months. I am off to a good start and am enjoying a higher return on my money than the stock market was offering me!”